Stream: contributing

Topic: crash exit code

view this post on Zulip Chris O'Donnell (May 11 2024 at 23:47):

I'm intrigued with Roc, and started taking a look at https://github.com/roc-lang/roc/issues/6688. I traced the crash call through parsing, canonicalization, and specialization; I believe it comes down to calling the platform here. I've tested this locally with basic-cli 0.10.0, and I can confirm crash exits with code 0. However, it looks to me like the roc_panic call should be landing in this codepath, which we should be exiting with code 1. Is anyone able to help correct my mental model so I can understand this behavior?

view this post on Zulip Brendan Hansknecht (May 12 2024 at 06:29):

So.....this is actually a much bigger bug that I'm really not sure the cause of..... essentially, while crashing, the app probably crashed in a way that blocked the exit code. So crashed while crashing leading to a wrong exit code. I'm a bit surprised the exit code was zero and not random memory garbage.

So probably a form of this issue: https://github.com/roc-lang/roc/issues/6121

view this post on Zulip Brendan Hansknecht (May 12 2024 at 06:30):

Probably a surgical linker bug

view this post on Zulip Brendan Hansknecht (May 12 2024 at 06:30):

You can try testing with --linker=legacy

view this post on Zulip Chris O'Donnell (May 12 2024 at 11:50):

Thanks! When running with roc --linker=legacy main.roc with the following main.roc

app [main] { pf: platform "https://github.com/roc-lang/basic-cli/releases/download/0.10.0/vNe6s9hWzoTZtFmNkvEICPErI9ptji_ySjicO6CkucY.tar.br" }

main = crash "CRASH"

I get the following output:

The program crashed with:

        CRASH

Here is the call stack that led to the crash:

        .libc
                ./csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h
        .libc
                ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c

Optimizations can make this list inaccurate! If it looks wrong, try running without `--optimize` and with `--linker=legacy`

I'm not entirely sure what to do with this; I may take a look at another issue where I can make forward progress on my own.

view this post on Zulip Brendan Hansknecht (May 12 2024 at 13:41):

Did it give the correct exit code?

view this post on Zulip Chris O'Donnell (May 12 2024 at 13:42):

No, it exited with code 0; forgot to add that to the output note. :man_facepalming:

Last updated: Jul 05 2025 at 12:14 UTC