Luke Boswell (Dec 16 2024 at 09:23): Luke Boswell (Dec 16 2024 at 09:23):What would you prefer to see in the examples, try or ??
# (1)
Stdout.line!? "$(datetime) $(Inspect.toStr req.method) $(req.uri)"
# (2)
try Stdout.line! "$(datetime) $(Inspect.toStr req.method) $(req.uri)"
@Sam Mohr -- do you have any guidance here? Is there a more "future-proof" version?
Sam Mohr (Dec 16 2024 at 09:26):I expect try will go away, I'd vote for ?
Sam Mohr (Dec 16 2024 at 09:26):It's not as good now, but it's the parens function call plan
Luke Boswell (Dec 16 2024 at 09:34):Screenshot 2024-12-16 at 20.34.14.png
It'd be nice if someone could update tree-sitter or the relevant syntax highlighting so the ? popped a little more
Sam Mohr (Dec 16 2024 at 09:37):I know @Eli Dowling has been waiting to make updates until after the deluge of syntax changes finishes
Sam Mohr (Dec 16 2024 at 09:37):But we can probably add an issue to the tree-sitter-roc repo that says we should highlight ! and ? as operators
Sam Mohr (Dec 16 2024 at 09:38):And then you can assign it to me
Sam Mohr (Dec 16 2024 at 09:38):I can't promise it'll get done this week, I'm still in choir throes, but it's an easy change IMO
Luke Boswell (Dec 16 2024 at 09:39):Yeah I can see the value in holding off... but I'm also hoping this is a super minor change. But I have no idea how the tree sitter grammar's a like to update. Or the process to feed that back to zed or the editors
Sam Mohr (Dec 16 2024 at 09:39):I've done it before
Sam Mohr (Dec 16 2024 at 09:39):Nothing crazy
Sam Mohr (Dec 16 2024 at 09:39):If Zed is anything like Helix, you just need to feed it an updated commit SHA for the tree sitter repo
Sam Mohr (Dec 16 2024 at 09:40):But maybe they use the latest commit by default? :woman_shrugging:
Richard Feldman (Dec 16 2024 at 12:18):personally I'd prefer try until we switch to parens-and-commas
Richard Feldman (Dec 16 2024 at 12:19):the main reason we added try was to avoid !? so I'd rather not have !? in the docs while we still have try and don't have parens-and-commas yet :big_smile:
Luke Boswell (Dec 17 2024 at 23:38):Do you think it's important to add HTTP to basic-ssg?
Luke Boswell (Dec 17 2024 at 23:38):I'm on the fence about adding these effects
Luke Boswell (Dec 17 2024 at 23:38):Haven't thought much about it though
Luke Boswell (Dec 17 2024 at 23:39):Like could you imagine using it in this? maybe fetch a json list of something?
main! : Args => Result {} _
main! = \{ inputDir, outputDir } ->
# get the path and url of markdown files in content directory
files = SSG.files!? inputDir
# helper Task to process each file
process_file! = \{ path, relpath, url } ->
inHtml = SSG.parse_markdown!? path
outHtml = transform_file_content url inHtml
SSG.write_file! { outputDir, relpath, content: outHtml }
## process each file
List.forEachTry! files process_file!
transform_file_content : Str, Str -> Str
transform_file_content = \current_url, html_content ->
when List.findFirst nav_links (\{ url } -> url == current_url) is
Ok current_nav_link -> Html.render (view current_nav_link html_content)
Err _ -> crash "unable to find nav link for URL: $(current_url)"
Decided to add it, just in case.
jan kili (Dec 18 2024 at 14:43):Could be nice for validating links? :shrug:
Last updated: Jul 05 2025 at 12:14 UTC